Wed, Jun 19 2002
20:29:44
|
|
Request created by guest
|
|
Subject: v.in.sdts segmentation fault on illegal tag
Platform: GNU/Linux/i386
grass obtained from: CVS
grass binary for platform: Compiled from Sources
GRASS Version: GRASS 5.0.0pre4 (May 2002)
I updated the Grass5pre4 source from CVS on June 18, 2002. I am running
SuSE 8.0 on PII 350 mHz system with 512 mb ram and a 20 gb hard disk. Upon
trying to read an SDTS data file for Caples Lake, Cailfornia that should
contain vector lines for contour data, I get an error.
v.in.sdts -i yields the following. v.in.sdts does not process the LE module
as part of this process.
v.in.sdts output -----------------
Processing CATD module
Processing STAT module
Processing IDEN module
Processing XREF module
Processing IREF module
*****************************************************
INFORMATION ABOUT THE SDTS DATA SET
*****************************************************
Identification module: 9760IDEN.DDF
Standard identification: SPATIAL DATA TRANSFER STANDARD
Standard version: 1998 JUNE 9
Standard documentation reference: ANSI NCITS 320-1998
Profile identification: SRPE: SDTS RASTER PROFILE and EXTENSIONS
Profile documentation reference: Federal Geographic Data Committee
FGDC-STD-002.5
Profile version: 1998
Title: CAPLES LAKE, CA-24000
Data ID: LAT:: 38 37 30.0000 N LONG:: -120 0
0.0000 W SCALE:: 24000
Data structure: DEM
Map date: 1998
Data set creation date: 2001823
External Spatial Reference module: 9760XREF.DDF
Reference System name: UTM
Horizontal Datum: NAS
Zone Number: 10
Spatial Domain module: 9760SPDM.DDF
Spatial Domain type: RING
Domain Spatial Address X: 926232626.000000
Domain Spatial Address Y: 875706168.000000
Domain Spatial Address X: 926169400.000000
Domain Spatial Address Y: 875706674.000000
Domain Spatial Address X: 926298167.000000
Domain Spatial Address Y: 875706675.000000
Domain Spatial Address X: 926298417.000000
Domain Spatial Address Y: 875706169.000000
MAP: CAPLES LAKE, CA
THEME: ELEVATION
MANIFOLD: DEM1
BOUNDARY:
MIN_X MIN_Y MAX_X MAX_Y
-1073746520.000000 1074487268.000000 134739968.000000
1073790160.000000
end ----------------------------------------------------------
Upon attempting to read in the data, I get a message:
Processing LE module: 9760LDEF.DDF Illegal Tag = LDEF
Then a string of illegal tag = LDEF messages, terminating in a segmentation
fault.
Thanks,
|
|
Fri, Jun 21 2002
13:09:46
|
|
Mail sent by egm2@jps.net
|
|
Return-Path |
<egm2@jps.net>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Date |
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 04:11:43 -0700
|
From |
"Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net>
|
To |
Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Cc |
grass5@grass.itc.it
|
Subject |
Re: [GRASS5] [bug #1124] (grass) v.in.sdts segmentation fault on illegal tag
|
Message-ID |
<20020621111143.GB21427@calico.local>
|
Mail-Followup-To |
Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
|
References |
<20020619182944.836E713A18@lists.intevation.de>
|
Mime-Version |
1.0
|
Content-Type |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
Content-Disposition |
inline
|
In-Reply-To |
<20020619182944.836E713A18@lists.intevation.de>
|
User-Agent |
Mutt/1.4i
|
Sender |
"Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net>
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Request Tracker wrote:
> this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=1124
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: v.in.sdts segmentation fault on illegal tag
> I updated the Grass5pre4 source from CVS on June 18, 2002. I am running
> SuSE 8.0 on PII 350 mHz system with 512 mb ram and a 20 gb hard disk. Upon
> trying to read an SDTS data file for Caples Lake, Cailfornia that should
> contain vector lines for contour data, I get an error.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Does it?
> v.in.sdts -i yields the following. v.in.sdts does not process the LE module
> as part of this process.
>
> v.in.sdts output -----------------
>
> Processing CATD module
> Processing STAT module
> Processing IDEN module
> Processing XREF module
> Processing IREF module
>
> *****************************************************
> INFORMATION ABOUT THE SDTS DATA SET
> *****************************************************
>
> Identification module: 9760IDEN.DDF
>
> Standard identification: SPATIAL DATA TRANSFER STANDARD
> Standard version: 1998 JUNE 9
> Standard documentation reference: ANSI NCITS 320-1998
> Profile identification: SRPE: SDTS RASTER PROFILE and EXTENSIONS
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is not the vector profile....
> Profile documentation reference: Federal Geographic Data Committee
> FGDC-STD-002.5
> Profile version: 1998
> Title: CAPLES LAKE, CA-24000
> Data ID: LAT:: 38 37 30.0000 N LONG:: -120 0
> 0.0000 W SCALE:: 24000
> Data structure: DEM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
And, it's an elevation model....
Use r.in.gdal to import SDTS DEM's....
--
Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
|
|
Fri, Jun 21 2002
22:52:35
|
|
Mail sent by jwd@softcom.net
|
|
Return-Path |
<jwd@softcom.net>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Content-Type |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
|
From |
John Dougherty <jwd@softcom.net>
|
To |
"Eric G. Miller" via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Subject |
Re: [bug #1124] (grass) v.in.sdts segmentation fault on illegal tag
|
Date |
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:56:12 -0700
|
X-Mailer |
KMail [version 1.4]
|
References |
<20020621110946.DAFE013A25@lists.intevation.de>
|
In-Reply-To |
<20020621110946.DAFE013A25@lists.intevation.de>
|
MIME-Version |
1.0
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding |
quoted-printable
|
Message-Id |
<200206211356.13091.jwd@softcom.net>
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
On Friday 21 June 2002 04:09, you wrote:
>
> =20
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is not the vector profile=
=2E...
>
> > Profile documentation reference: Federal Geographic Data Committee
> > FGDC-STD-002.5
> > Profile version: 1998
> > Title: CAPLES LAKE, CA-24000
> > Data ID: LAT:: 38 37 30.0000 N LONG:: -12=
0 0
> > 0.0000 W SCALE:: 24000
> > Data structure: DEM
>
> =20
I wondered about that particular statement. It was part of why I posted =
to=20
the mailing list first. I know very, very, very little about SDTS standa=
rds=20
- or GIS for that matter and assumed Datadepot was telling the truth. Th=
e=20
data came from what is supposed to be a collection of DLGs for USGS quads=
in=20
particular California counties on the GeoCommunity GIS DataDepot site. T=
he=20
file is described as hypsography on the site - under California|Amador=20
County|California. There is no Caples Lake DEM under the DEMs section fo=
r=20
the county. =20
Anyway, you are perfectly right and r.in.gdal worked. Trying to generate=
a=20
contour map is giving some problems. V.support is stopping at the "attac=
hing=20
labels" step.
I can only comfort myself that the only stupid question is one you don't =
ask.=20
Thanks,
John
|
|
Mon, Aug 5 2002
12:52:44
|
|
Comments added by guest
|
|
is this supposed to be open to anyone?? I found the link through Google. |
|
Mon, Mar 31 2003
09:38:16
|
|
Status changed to resolved by egmiller
|
|