Details Ticket 2731


Comment | Reply | Take | Open


Serial Number 2731
Subject F77, REQUIREMENTS.html
Area grass6
Queue grass
Requestors jidanni@jidanni.org,tutey@o2.pl
Owner none
Status resolved
Last User Contact Sun Nov 26 17:56:13 2006 (2 yr ago)
Current Priority 30
Final Priority 70
Due No date assigned
Last Action Sun Nov 26 18:53:00 2006 (2 yr ago)
Created Sun Nov 28 03:54:36 2004 (4 yr ago)

Transaction History Ticket 2731


Sun, Nov 28 2004 03:54:36    Request created by jidanni@jidanni.org  
Return-Path <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
To grass-bugs@intevation.de
Subject F77, REQUIREMENTS.html
From Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Date Sun, 28 Nov 2004 09:09:57 +0800
Message-ID <87pt1yrd7e.fsf@jidanni.org>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level
In configure.in: AC_CHECK_PROGS(F77, g77 f77)
In grass57_exp_2004_11_27/REQUIREMENTS.html F77 is not mentioned.


Sun, Nov 28 2004 06:18:56    Mail sent by glynn@gclements.plus.com  
Return-Path <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
From Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Message-ID <16809.24489.614372.320282@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
Date Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:18:33 +0000
To Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
Cc grass5@grass.itc.it
Subject Re: [GRASS5] [bug #2731] (grass) F77, REQUIREMENTS.html
In-Reply-To <20041128025436.9F2F4102BDA@lists.intevation.de>
References <20041128025436.9F2F4102BDA@lists.intevation.de>
X-Mailer VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 15) "Security Through Obscurity" XEmacs Lucid
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level
Request Tracker wrote:

> In configure.in: AC_CHECK_PROGS(F77, g77 f77)
> In grass57_exp_2004_11_27/REQUIREMENTS.html F77 is not mentioned.

It doesn't appear to be used in 5.7. In 5.3, it's only used for
modules which aren't built by default:

	src/sites/cdhc
	src.contrib/CERL/SGI/ISM/grid
	src.contrib/CERL/misc/m.eigensystem
	src.garden/answers/src.answers
	src.garden/grass.hdf
	src.garden/grass.rim

In 5.7, lib/cdhc contains four Fortran files, but they aren't actually
used.

The configure check should probably be removed.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>


Mon, Nov 29 2004 10:18:56    Mail sent by neteler@itc.it  
Return-Path <neteler@itc.it>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
Date Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:20:31 +0100
From Markus Neteler <neteler@itc.it>
To Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
Cc Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
Subject Re: [GRASS5] [bug #2731] (grass) F77, REQUIREMENTS.html
Message-ID <20041129092031.GG27571@thuille.itc.it>
Mail-Followup-To Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>, Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
References <20041128025436.9F2F4102BDA@lists.intevation.de> <16809.24489.614372.320282@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <16809.24489.614372.320282@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
User-Agent Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:18:33AM +0000, Glynn Clements wrote:
> 
> Request Tracker wrote:
> 
> > In configure.in: AC_CHECK_PROGS(F77, g77 f77)
> > In grass57_exp_2004_11_27/REQUIREMENTS.html F77 is not mentioned.
> 
> It doesn't appear to be used in 5.7. In 5.3, it's only used for
> modules which aren't built by default:
> 
> 	src/sites/cdhc
> 	src.contrib/CERL/SGI/ISM/grid
> 	src.contrib/CERL/misc/m.eigensystem
> 	src.garden/answers/src.answers
> 	src.garden/grass.hdf
> 	src.garden/grass.rim
> 
> In 5.7, lib/cdhc contains four Fortran files, but they aren't actually
> used.
> 
> The configure check should probably be removed.

Done in CVS.

Markus


Mon, Nov 29 2004 10:19:08    Status changed to resolved by mneteler  
Tue, Jan 10 2006 09:56:02    Request created by guest (as #3973)  
Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set

Platform: GNU/Linux/i386
grass obtained from: CVS
grass binary for platform: Compiled from Sources
GRASS Version: cvs 2005.01.10

Although I have g77 and f77 present in my system...

$ f77 --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 3.4.5 20050809 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 3.4.4-6ubuntu8)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

$ g77 --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 3.4.5 20050809 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 3.4.4-6ubuntu8)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

...the FORTRAN compiler is not set at ./configure:

GRASS is now configured for:  i686-pc-linux-gnu

 Source directory:            /home/john/src/straight/grass6
 Build directory:             /home/john/src/straight/grass6
 Installation directory:      /usr/local/grass-6.1.cvs
 Startup script in directory: ${exec_prefix}/bin
 C compiler:                  gcc -g -O2
 C++ compiler:                c++ -g -O2
 FORTRAN compiler:                              <- SHOULDN'T IT BE g77 OR STH?
Building shared libraries:   yes
 64bit support:               no

  NVIZ:                       yes

  X11 support:                yes
  JPEG support:               yes
  TIFF support:               yes
  PNG support:                yes
  Tcl/Tk support:             yes
  PostgreSQL support:         yes
  MySQL support:              no
  SQLite support:             yes
  FFMPEG support:             no
  OpenGL(R) support:          yes
  ODBC support:               no
  FFTW support:               yes
  BLAS support:               no
  LAPACK support:             no
  Motif support:              no
  FreeType support:           yes
  GLw support:                no
  NLS support:                no
  Readline support:           no
  C++ support:                yes
  openDWG support:            no
  GDAL support:               yes
  OGR support:                yes
  Large File Support (LFS):   yes

Maciek
Tue, Jan 10 2006 17:57:04    Mail sent by glynn@gclements.plus.com (as #3973)  
Return-Path <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
From Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Message-ID <17347.59227.536734.461676@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:56:59 +0000
To Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
Cc grass5@grass.itc.it
Subject Re: [GRASS5] [bug #3973] (grass) ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
In-Reply-To <20060110085603.095EC1005D0@lists.intevation.de>
References <20060110085603.095EC1005D0@lists.intevation.de>
X-Mailer VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 15) "Security Through Obscurity" XEmacs Lucid
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level
Request Tracker wrote:

> this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set

The check was disabled in configure.in:

	revision 1.65
	date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58;  author: markus;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
	disabled F77 as not needed

lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>


Tue, Jan 10 2006 18:50:12    Request 3973 merged into 2731 by mneteler (as #3973)  
Tue, Jan 10 2006 18:50:29    Mail sent by neteler@itc.it (as #3973)  
Return-Path <neteler@itc.it>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:50:23 +0100
From Markus Neteler <neteler@itc.it>
To Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
Cc Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
Subject Re: [GRASS5] [bug #3973] (grass) ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
Message-ID <20060110175023.GB17205@bartok.itc.it>
Mail-Followup-To Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>, Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
References <20060110085603.095EC1005D0@lists.intevation.de> <17347.59227.536734.461676@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <17347.59227.536734.461676@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
User-Agent Mutt/1.4.1i
X-PGP-Key http://www.gdf-hannover.de/neteler/markus_gpgkey.asc
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:56:59PM +0000, Glynn Clements wrote:
> 
> Request Tracker wrote:
> 
> > this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
> 
> The check was disabled in configure.in:
> 
> 	revision 1.65
> 	date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58;  author: markus;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
> 	disabled F77 as not needed

See
 http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731

You suggested to (probably) remove it:

  Glynn Clements  glynn at gclements.plus.com
  Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:18:33 +0000
  "The configure check should probably be removed."
  http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2004-November/016200.html
 
> lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.

So, do we want it back? Doesn't it confuse people who do not have
Fortran installed (such as the ongoing BLAS/LAPACK confusion)?

Markus


Tue, Jan 10 2006 18:50:29    Status changed to open by _rt_system  
Tue, Jan 10 2006 19:23:11    Mail sent by glynn@gclements.plus.com (as #3973)  
Return-Path <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
From Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Message-ID <17347.64395.934899.22844@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:23:07 +0000
To Markus Neteler <neteler@itc.it>
Cc Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
Subject Re: [GRASS5] [bug #3973] (grass) ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
In-Reply-To <20060110175023.GB17205@bartok.itc.it>
References <20060110085603.095EC1005D0@lists.intevation.de> <17347.59227.536734.461676@cerise.gclements.plus.com> <20060110175023.GB17205@bartok.itc.it>
X-Mailer VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 15) "Security Through Obscurity" XEmacs Lucid
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level
Markus Neteler wrote:

> > > this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
> > 
> > The check was disabled in configure.in:
> > 
> > 	revision 1.65
> > 	date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58;  author: markus;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
> > 	disabled F77 as not needed
> 
> See
>  http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731
> 
> You suggested to (probably) remove it:
> 
>   Glynn Clements  glynn at gclements.plus.com
>   Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:18:33 +0000
>   "The configure check should probably be removed."
>   http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2004-November/016200.html
>  
> > lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.
> 
> So, do we want it back? Doesn't it confuse people who do not have
> Fortran installed (such as the ongoing BLAS/LAPACK confusion)?

At a minimum, while the f77/g77 check in configure.in is disabled, the
"FORTRAN compiler" message should also be disabled.

Also, if the Fortran files in lib/cdhc are no longer necessary, they
should probably be removed.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>


Wed, Jan 11 2006 09:56:35    Mail sent by neteler@itc.it (as #3973)  
Return-Path <neteler@itc.it>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
Date Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:56:25 +0100
From Markus Neteler <neteler@itc.it>
To Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
Cc Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
Subject Re: [GRASS5] [bug #3973] (grass) ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
Message-ID <20060111085625.GB21023@bartok.itc.it>
Mail-Followup-To Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>, Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, grass5@grass.itc.it
References <20060110085603.095EC1005D0@lists.intevation.de> <17347.59227.536734.461676@cerise.gclements.plus.com> <20060110175023.GB17205@bartok.itc.it> <17347.64395.934899.22844@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <17347.64395.934899.22844@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
User-Agent Mutt/1.4.1i
X-PGP-Key http://www.gdf-hannover.de/neteler/markus_gpgkey.asc
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:23:07PM +0000, Glynn Clements wrote:
> 
> Markus Neteler wrote:
> 
> > > > this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
> > > 
> > > The check was disabled in configure.in:
> > > 
> > > 	revision 1.65
> > > 	date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58;  author: markus;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
> > > 	disabled F77 as not needed
> > 
> > See
> >  http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731
> > 
> > You suggested to (probably) remove it:
> > 
> >   Glynn Clements  glynn at gclements.plus.com
> >   Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:18:33 +0000
> >   "The configure check should probably be removed."
> >   http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2004-November/016200.html
> >  
> > > lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.
> > 
> > So, do we want it back? Doesn't it confuse people who do not have
> > Fortran installed (such as the ongoing BLAS/LAPACK confusion)?
> 
> At a minimum, while the f77/g77 check in configure.in is disabled, the
> "FORTRAN compiler" message should also be disabled.
> 
> Also, if the Fortran files in lib/cdhc are no longer necessary, they
> should probably be removed.
> 
> -- 
> Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>

Someone may to submit necessary changes.

Markus


Mon, Jan 16 2006 17:18:52    Status changed to resolved by thomas  
Mon, Jan 16 2006 17:19:04    Status changed to open by thomas  
Wed, Jul 12 2006 11:10:12    Area changed to grass6 by msieczka  
Wed, Jul 26 2006 14:20:07    User changed to jidanni@jidanni.org,tutey@o2.pl by msieczka  
Thu, Aug 3 2006 16:03:56    Mail sent by guest  
What's the status of this bug? Have the fortran compiler messages been removed?
Markus, can you comment?

~ Eric.
<epatton at nrcan dot gc dot ca>
Tue, Sep 26 2006 18:33:45    Comments added by guest  
Good Luck! http://xoomer.alice.it/pik0/poker-rooms/
Tue, Sep 26 2006 22:38:55    Comments added by guest  
Cool design http://xoomer.alice.it/pik0/razz-poker/
Wed, Sep 27 2006 01:23:42    Comments added by guest  
Great work on website. <a href="http://xoomer.alice.it/pik0/rules-of-poker/">rules
of poker</a> [url=http://xoomer.alice.it/pik0/rules-of-poker/]rules of poker[/url]
http://xoomer.alice.it/pik0/rules-of-poker/
Sun, Nov 26 2006 15:07:38    Mail sent by mneteler  
Brad,

[bugtracker: https://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731 ]

you have been cleaning up lib/cdhc recently. While looking at this
report, I found that 2 Fortran files are still there in lib/cdhc/.
Do we need them?

Markus
Sun, Nov 26 2006 17:56:13    Mail sent by rez@touchofmadness.com  
Return-Path <rez@touchofmadness.com>
Delivered-To grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
Subject Re: [bug #2731] (grass) F77, REQUIREMENTS.html
From Brad Douglas <rez@touchofmadness.com>
Reply-To rez@touchofmadness.com
To Markus Neteler via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
Cc jidanni@jidanni.org, tutey@o2.pl
In-Reply-To <20061126140738.6D3681005A3@lists.intevation.de>
References <20061126140738.6D3681005A3@lists.intevation.de>
Content-Type text/plain
Date Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:55:41 -0800
Message-Id <1164560142.21839.70.camel@devel>
Mime-Version 1.0
X-Mailer Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5)
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned by amavisd-new at intevation.de
X-Spam-Status No, hits=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=3 tests=[BAYES_00=-5]
X-Spam-Level
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 15:07 +0100, Markus Neteler via RT wrote:
> Brad,
> 
> [bugtracker: https://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731 ]
> 
> you have been cleaning up lib/cdhc recently. While looking at this
> report, I found that 2 Fortran files are still there in lib/cdhc/.
> Do we need them?

I only kept them for posterior.  I wasn't sure if there was some
historical reason or incomplete functionality that was keeping them
around.  Fixed in CVS.


-- 
Brad Douglas <rez touchofmadness com>                    KB8UYR/6
Address: 37.493,-121.924 / WGS84    National Map Corps #TNMC-3785


Sun, Nov 26 2006 18:53:00    Status changed to resolved by msieczka  
Comment | Reply | Take | Open

You are currently authenticated as guest.
[Show Configuration] [Login as another user]

Users Guide - Mail Commands - Homepage of RequestTracker 1.0.7 - list any request