Thu, Jan 19 2006
17:25:38
|
|
Request created by guest
|
|
Subject: error compiling r.le.setup in cvs
Platform: GNU/Linux/x86
grass obtained from: CVS
grass binary for platform: Compiled from Sources
GRASS Version: CVS checked out at 20060119
compiled from CVS with the following configure line
CFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=pentium-m -Wall" LDFLAGS="-s" ./configure --with-tcltk-includes=/usr/include/tcl8
.3
--with-postgres-includes=/usr/include/postgresql --with-sqlite --with-cxx --with-fftw
--with-freetype-includes=/usr/includes/freetype2/
after make:
Generating HTML manual pages index (help system)...
Generated HTML docs in ../dist.i686-pc-linux-gnu/docs/html/index.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Following modules are missing the 'description.html' file in src code:
g.pnmcomp
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GRASS GIS compilation log
-------------------------
Started compilation: gio gen 19 16:56:41 CET 2006
--
Errors in:
/home/steko/src/grass6/raster/r.le/r.le.setup
--
Finished compilation: gio gen 19 17:13:48 CET 2006
(In case of errors please change into the directory with error and run 'make')
then I followed the instructions but the make in the subdir didn't go well:
steko@cycnus:~/src/grass6/raster/r.le/r.le.setup$ make
Makefile:16: warning: overriding commands for target `clean'
../../../include/Make/Rules.make:34: warning: ignoring old commands for target
`clean'
gcc -I/home/steko/src/grass6/include -I/home/steko/src/grass6/dist.i686-pc-linux-gnu/include/grass
-O3 -mtune=pentium-m -Wall -Wall -Wconversion -Wno-implicit-int -I/usr/local/include
-DPACKAGE=\""grassmods"\" -I/home/steko/src/grass6/include -I/home/steko/src/grass6/dist.i686-pc-li
nux-gnu/include/grass
\
-o OBJ.i686-pc-linux-gnu/sample.o -c sample.c
sample.c: In function ‘sample’:
sample.c:39: warning: unused variable ‘btn’
sample.c: In function ‘man_unit’:
sample.c:554: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘G_calloc’ as unsigned due to
prototype
sample.c:555: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘G_calloc’ as unsigned due to
prototype
sample.c:121: warning: unused variable ‘wind’
sample.c:120: warning: unused variable ‘sites_mapset’
sample.c:117: warning: unused variable ‘au_l’
sample.c:117: warning: unused variable ‘au_w’
sample.c:117: warning: unused variable ‘ab’
sample.c:117: warning: unused variable ‘at’
sample.c:117: warning: unused variable ‘ar’
sample.c:117: warning: unused variable ‘al’
sample.c:115: warning: unused variable ‘itmp’
sample.c:114: warning: unused variable ‘randflag’
sample.c:114: warning: unused variable ‘t0’
sample.c:114: warning: unused variable ‘l0’
sample.c:113: warning: unused variable ‘dy’
sample.c:113: warning: unused variable ‘dx’
sample.c: In function ‘draw_grid’:
sample.c:653: warning: unused variable ‘tmp’
sample.c:653: warning: unused variable ‘itmp’
sample.c:653: warning: unused variable ‘k’
sample.c: In function ‘calc_unit_loc’:
sample.c:821: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
sample.c:730: warning: unused variable ‘tmp’
sample.c:729: warning: unused variable ‘k’
sample.c:727: warning: unused variable ‘region’
sample.c: In function ‘graph_unit’:
sample.c:1052: warning: unused variable ‘tmpl’
sample.c:1052: warning: unused variable ‘tmpw’
sample.c: In function ‘draw_circle’:
sample.c:1487: warning: unused variable ‘yr’
sample.c:1487: warning: unused variable ‘x2’
sample.c: In function ‘numtrap’:
sample.c:1537: warning: unused variable ‘j’
sample.c: In function ‘calc_num’:
sample.c:1013: warning: ‘max’ may be used uninitialized in this function
sample.c: In function ‘calc_unit_loc’:
sample.c:865: internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:1922
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see <URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs>.
make: *** [OBJ.i686-pc-linux-gnu/sample.o] Error 1
steko@cycnus:~/src/grass6/raster/r.le/r.le.setup$
HTH, regards
Stefano |
|
Sun, Jan 22 2006
22:27:50
|
|
Mail sent by guest
|
|
Stefano,
since it compiles on RHEL4 and Mandriva 2006 and Suse 9.x, I
wonder about the
'internal compiler error'. Doesn't look good to me!
On the other hand the r.le code isn't really clean.
Markus |
|
Mon, Feb 6 2006
22:53:40
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
Stephano
Builds well on Ubuntu Breezy here.
Do you still experience this problem or can I close it now? Need more help?
Maciek |
|
Tue, Feb 7 2006
10:55:54
|
|
Mail sent by steko@iosa.it
|
|
Return-Path |
<steko@iosa.it>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Date |
Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:58:08 +0100
|
From |
Stefano Costa <steko@iosa.it>
|
Subject |
Re: [bug #4021] (grass) error compiling r.le.setup in cvs
|
In-reply-to |
<20060206215340.E4CF9100159@lists.intevation.de>
|
To |
Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Message-id |
<1139306288.8255.52.camel@localhost.localdomain>
|
MIME-version |
1.0
|
X-Mailer |
Evolution 2.4.1
|
Content-type |
text/plain
|
Content-transfer-encoding |
7bit
|
References |
<20060206215340.E4CF9100159@lists.intevation.de>
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
Il giorno lun, 06/02/2006 alle 22.53 +0100, Maciek Sieczka via RT ha
scritto:
> Stephano
>
> Builds well on Ubuntu Breezy here.
>
> Do you still experience this problem or can I close it now? Need more help?
Maciek,
I downloaded a fresh CVS right now, but it keeps giving me this problem.
It sounds odd to me, too.
This is my ./configure line:
CFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=pentium-m -Wall" LDFLAGS="-s" ./configure
--with-tcltk-includes=/usr/include/tcl8.3
--with-postgres-includes=/usr/include/postgresql --with-sqlite
--with-cxx --with-fftw --with-freetype-includes=/usr/includes/freetype2/
--with-readline
I'll try again to see if I can find some clue.
Thanks,
Stefano
|
|
Tue, Feb 7 2006
11:49:27
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
Stefano,
One thing I can see is taht you are propably using Gcc 4.0 ar above right?
pentium-m is not availbale in older versions.
If turn off optimization, does that work? (NOTE: use march= instead of mtune=
if you optimise. mtune is deprecated afaik in newer GCC; and march also
implies mtune - refer to GNU GCC www).
Can you try GCC 3.4?
I on Breezy am using gcc3.4, though I have 4.0 also installed. If you have
different gcc versions installed you can choose the prefferred version by
managing symlinks in your /usr/bin (and /etc/alternatives if you have it).
What distro are you using?
Maciek |
|
Tue, Feb 7 2006
12:38:40
|
|
Mail sent by steko@iosa.it
|
|
Return-Path |
<steko@iosa.it>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Date |
Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:41:03 +0100
|
From |
Stefano Costa <steko@iosa.it>
|
Subject |
Re: [bug #4021] (grass) error compiling r.le.setup in cvs
|
In-reply-to |
<20060207104927.C98B41005A4@lists.intevation.de>
|
To |
Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Message-id |
<1139312463.8255.97.camel@localhost.localdomain>
|
MIME-version |
1.0
|
X-Mailer |
Evolution 2.4.1
|
Content-type |
text/plain
|
Content-transfer-encoding |
7bit
|
References |
<20060207104927.C98B41005A4@lists.intevation.de>
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
Il giorno mar, 07/02/2006 alle 11.49 +0100, Maciek Sieczka via RT ha
scritto:
> Stefano,
>
> One thing I can see is taht you are propably using Gcc 4.0 ar above right?
> pentium-m is not availbale in older versions.
>
> If turn off optimization, does that work? (NOTE: use march= instead of mtune=
> if you optimise. mtune is deprecated afaik in newer GCC; and march also
> implies mtune - refer to GNU GCC www).
>
> Can you try GCC 3.4?
>
> I on Breezy am using gcc3.4, though I have 4.0 also installed. If you have
> different gcc versions installed you can choose the prefferred version by
> managing symlinks in your /usr/bin (and /etc/alternatives if you have it).
>
> What distro are you using?
>
> Maciek
Maciek,
I am using Ubuntu Breezy, it's up-to-date.
/usr/bin/gcc points to gcc-4.0, it's the only compiler I have
installed. I'm going to install gcc-3.4 too right now.
On GCC www I can see that `-mtune' is not deprecated, while `-mcpu' is.
I'll try the `march' option, too, however. I try to use optimization
while compiling but I'm not a programmer at all, so I just follow
step-by-step the instructions I found in GRASS and GCC docs. In fact, I
see that `-mtune' and `-march' are accepted by gcc-3.4 too:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.5/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html#i386-and-x86_002d64-Opt
ions
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html#i386-and-x86_002d64-Opt
ions
Compiling with gcc-3.4 WITHOUT optimization gives me no errors.
Compiling with gcc-3.4 WITH optimization: CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium-m
-Wall" LDFLAGS="-s" gives the known error in r.le.setup.
So perhaps it has something to do with the optimization options. I'll
be back from lunch in a hour, then continue to check it, but I have to
do some work for my exams too! :)
Stefano
|
|
Tue, Feb 7 2006
22:56:40
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
> On GCC www I can see that `-mtune' is not deprecated, while `-mcpu' is.
Sorry about that. I must have thought of -mcpu then. Note -march gives more
optimization than -mtune alone however _and_ implies -mtune.
I'm a non-programmer too. My flags on a pentium dothan pentium m based laptop,
gcc 3.4:
NOTE: propably I should be rather using pentium-m instead of pentium4, but I'm
still not 100% sure - isn't pentium-m for Banias Pentium M cpus only, not for
Dothan ones? Maybe you know?
---
export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-s -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,-O,2"
export CXXFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -s -pipe"
export CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -s
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
export FFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -s -pipe"
export PYTHON_OPT="-march=pentium4 -O2 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -s
-pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
---
I put them into a txt file, and source it when I need optimization. They will
remain set only for the current terminal session, not affecting your general
environment.
Those are the safe but stil pretty good optimization. -O3 might give opposite
effect in many cases I read. Or, as we can see, it will fail for some dirtier
code.
If you finally sort out what's the problem - gcc 4.0 alone or the -O3 with
either gcc 3.4 or 4.0 please report to grass devel list. There's been some
ongoing code cleanup, devs might be interested in this case.
Maciek |
|
Wed, Feb 8 2006
09:21:10
|
|
Mail sent by steko@iosa.it
|
|
Return-Path |
<steko@iosa.it>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Date |
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 09:23:41 +0100
|
From |
Stefano Costa <steko@iosa.it>
|
Subject |
Re: [bug #4021] (grass) error compiling r.le.setup in cvs
|
In-reply-to |
<20060207215640.BF47D1006A1@lists.intevation.de>
|
To |
Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Message-id |
<1139387021.8228.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
|
MIME-version |
1.0
|
X-Mailer |
Evolution 2.4.1
|
Content-type |
text/plain
|
Content-transfer-encoding |
7bit
|
References |
<20060207215640.BF47D1006A1@lists.intevation.de>
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
Il giorno mar, 07/02/2006 alle 22.56 +0100, Maciek Sieczka via RT ha
scritto:
> > On GCC www I can see that `-mtune' is not deprecated, while `-mcpu' is.
>
> Sorry about that. I must have thought of -mcpu then. Note -march gives more
> optimization than -mtune alone however _and_ implies -mtune.
Yes, thanks to your advice I noticed that.
> I'm a non-programmer too. My flags on a pentium dothan pentium m based laptop,
> gcc 3.4:
>
> NOTE: propably I should be rather using pentium-m instead of pentium4, but
I'm
> still not 100% sure - isn't pentium-m for Banias Pentium M cpus only, not for
> Dothan ones? Maybe you know?
I really never heard about Banias nor Dothan at all :(
My laptop is a Centrino, if it helps!
I figured out that it's not a 3.4 vs 4.0 issue, because compiling
without optimization flags works well with both versions. So it must be
something that has to do with the `-03 -march=pentium-m' part
I'm trying `-02 -march=pentium-m' and it gives no errors. Now I'm
double-checking again in `-03' gives that error, then I'll post it to
the grass devel list.
Thanks for your support,
Stefano
--
Stefano Costa
http://www.iosa.it Software Open Source per l'Archeologia
Jabber: steko@jabber.linux.it
GnuPG Key ID 1024D/0xD0D30245
Linux Registered User #385969 counter.li.org
|
|
Wed, Feb 8 2006
09:57:30
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
> I really never heard about Banias nor Dothan at all :(
> My laptop is a Centrino, if it helps!
There are 2 flavors of Penium M - Banias and Dothan.
Banias has 1 MB cache L2 and is more like PIII
Dothan has 2 MB cache L2 and is more like PIV, but not exactly.
Centrino is a hardware platform for laptops - a combination of severeal pieces
of hardware, Pentium M CPU among them.
The Banias Pentium M based laptop hardware platfom is called Centrino.
The Dothan Pentium M based laptop hardware platfom is called Centrino Sonoma.
That's what I know briefly, for whatever it matters.
> Now I'm double-checking again in `-03' gives that error
Good. Make sure you use only -O3 optimization _alone_ for a test - we'll be
sure then it is the culprit.
Best,
Maciek
|
|
Wed, Feb 8 2006
10:56:37
|
|
Mail sent by steko@iosa.it
|
|
Return-Path |
<steko@iosa.it>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Date |
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:59:07 +0100
|
From |
Stefano Costa <steko@iosa.it>
|
Subject |
Re: [bug #4021] (grass) error compiling r.le.setup in cvs
|
In-reply-to |
<20060208085730.CA9F41006C5@lists.intevation.de>
|
To |
Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Message-id |
<1139392747.8228.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
|
MIME-version |
1.0
|
X-Mailer |
Evolution 2.4.1
|
Content-type |
text/plain
|
Content-transfer-encoding |
7bit
|
References |
<20060208085730.CA9F41006C5@lists.intevation.de>
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
Il giorno mer, 08/02/2006 alle 09.57 +0100, Maciek Sieczka via RT ha
scritto:
> > Now I'm double-checking again in `-03' gives that error
>
> Good. Make sure you use only -O3 optimization _alone_ for a test - we'll be
> sure then it is the culprit.
Right, that's it.
Compiling with `-03' alone returns the error. I'll post it to the
grass-devel list, should I? Are all our messages stored in the bug
tracker?
Best regards,
Stefano
|
|
Wed, Feb 8 2006
12:00:35
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
> Right, that's it.
> Compiling with `-03' alone returns the error.
Good job.
> I'll post it to the grass-devel list, should I?
Please do it.
> Are all our messages stored in > the bug tracker?
Yes. In your message put the link to our discussion:
https://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=4021
Maciek |
|
Thu, Feb 9 2006
11:09:26
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
Check this:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Talk:CFLAGS_matrix
It says -O3 implies -frename-registers, which is claimed to be problematic -
on the same page and on http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix.
Some gcc whiz would need to express his opinion.
Maciek
|
|
Thu, Feb 9 2006
11:25:50
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
Check this:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Talk:CFLAGS_matrix
It says -O3 implies -frename-registers, which is claimed to be problematic -
on the same page and on http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix.
Some gcc whiz would need to express his opinion.
Maciek
|
|
Thu, Feb 9 2006
11:56:49
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
Check this:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Talk:CFLAGS_matrix
It says -O3 implies -frename-registers, which is claimed to be problematic -
on the same page and on http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix.
Some gcc whiz would need to express his opinion.
Maciek
|
|
Thu, Feb 16 2006
14:35:46
|
|
Mail sent by msieczka
|
|
The author seems to have lost his interest, so I'll forward to the list.
I have confirmed the bug with today's Grass 6.1 CVS, using GCC 3.4.4, Ubuntu
Breezy.
It shows that building Grass 6.1 with -O3 optimization always leads to errors
in /home/steko/src/grass6/raster/r.le/r.le.setup
This is important because the Grass INSTALL file itself recommends using -O3:
$ cat src/straight/grass6/INSTALL | grep O3
CFLAGS="-O3 -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -minline-all-stringops" # Intel XEON
64bit processor
CFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=<cpu_see_above> -Wall" LDFLAGS="-s" ./configure
Even despite the error at building r.le.setup - does it really make sense for
Grass to be -O3 optimized? As far as I have read it is rather not advised to
use it...
Maciek
|
|
Thu, Feb 16 2006
14:54:33
|
|
Mail sent by steko@iosa.it
|
|
Return-Path |
<steko@iosa.it>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Message-ID |
<1140098057.43f48409018a4@cp.tophost.it>
|
Date |
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:54:17 +0100
|
From |
Stefano Costa <steko@iosa.it>
|
To |
Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Cc |
grass5@grass.itc.it
|
Subject |
Re: [bug #4021] (grass) error compiling r.le.setup in cvs
|
References |
<20060216133546.DED581005DE@lists.intevation.de>
|
In-Reply-To |
<20060216133546.DED581005DE@lists.intevation.de>
|
MIME-Version |
1.0
|
Content-Type |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding |
8bit
|
User-Agent |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5
|
X-Originating-IP |
193.205.5.2
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
Scrive Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>:
> The author seems to have lost his interest, so I'll forward to the list.
>
> I have confirmed the bug with today's Grass 6.1 CVS, using GCC 3.4.4, Ubuntu
> Breezy.
>
> It shows that building Grass 6.1 with -O3 optimization always leads to errors
> in /home/steko/src/grass6/raster/r.le/r.le.setup
I think that, if one has the time to do some tests (I don't), it would be useful
to perform compiling with the various optimization options that -03 enables[1],
just one by one instead of using the cumulative option -03.
to see which one gives problems. In particular I can see it is frename-registers
that is likely to cause trouble, though not being that much useful.
Does William Baker[2] still participates in GRASS development?
[1]
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.4/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-O3-364
[2] http://grass.itc.it/grass61/manuals/html61_user/r.le.setup.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
|
|
Thu, Feb 16 2006
21:10:24
|
|
Mail sent by neteler@itc.it
|
|
Return-Path |
<neteler@itc.it>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Date |
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:10:17 +0100
|
From |
Markus Neteler <neteler@itc.it>
|
To |
Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Cc |
steko@iosa.it, grass5@grass.itc.it
|
Subject |
Re: [GRASS5] [bug #4021] (grass) error compiling r.le.setup in cvs
|
Message-ID |
<20060216201017.GA31678@bartok.itc.it>
|
Mail-Followup-To |
Maciek Sieczka via RT <grass-bugs@intevation.de>, steko@iosa.it, grass5@grass.itc.it
|
References |
<20060216133546.DED581005DE@lists.intevation.de>
|
Mime-Version |
1.0
|
Content-Type |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
Content-Disposition |
inline
|
In-Reply-To |
<20060216133546.DED581005DE@lists.intevation.de>
|
User-Agent |
Mutt/1.4.1i
|
X-PGP-Key |
http://www.gdf-hannover.de/neteler/markus_gpgkey.asc
|
X-Spam-Status |
No, hits=-4.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
|
X-Spam-Level |
|
Maciek, Stefano,
I have changed the INSTALL file (also for 6.0.2) from
-O3 to -O2.
Thanks for pointing out the problem. I think we can close
the report now.
Markus
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 02:35:46PM +0100, Maciek Sieczka via RT wrote:
> The author seems to have lost his interest, so I'll forward to the list.
>
> I have confirmed the bug with today's Grass 6.1 CVS, using GCC 3.4.4, Ubuntu
> Breezy.
>
> It shows that building Grass 6.1 with -O3 optimization always leads to errors
> in /home/steko/src/grass6/raster/r.le/r.le.setup
>
>
> This is important because the Grass INSTALL file itself recommends using -O3:
>
>
> $ cat src/straight/grass6/INSTALL | grep O3
> CFLAGS="-O3 -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -minline-all-stringops" # Intel XEON
> 64bit processor
> CFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=<cpu_see_above> -Wall" LDFLAGS="-s" ./configure
>
> Even despite the error at building r.le.setup - does it really make sense for
> Grass to be -O3 optimized? As far as I have read it is rather not advised to
> use it...
>
> Maciek
>
>
> -------------------------------------------- Managed by Request Tracker
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass5 mailing list
> grass5@grass.itc.it
> http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5
--
Markus Neteler <neteler itc it> http://mpa.itc.it
ITC-irst - Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica
MPBA - Predictive Models for Biol. & Environ. Data Analysis
Via Sommarive, 18 - 38050 Povo (Trento), Italy
|
|
Sun, Feb 19 2006
17:39:32
|
|
Status changed to resolved by mneteler
|
|