Fri, Nov 16 2001
18:24:53
|
|
Request created by neteler@itc.it
|
|
Return-Path |
<neteler@itc.it>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
Resent-Message-Id |
<200111161724.fAGHOoL29904@thuille.itc.it.>
|
From |
Markus Neteler <neteler@itc.it>
|
To |
grass5 developers list <grass5@grass.itc.it>
|
Message-ID |
<20011102115002.I2289@itc.it>
|
Mail-Followup-To |
grass5 developers list <grass5@grass.itc.it>
|
Mime-Version |
1.0
|
Content-Type |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
Content-Disposition |
inline
|
User-Agent |
Mutt/1.2.5i
|
Subject |
[GRASS5] Suggestion: d.leg.thin -> d.legend
|
Sender |
grass5-admin@grass.itc.it
|
Errors-To |
grass5-admin@grass.itc.it
|
X-BeenThere |
grass5@grass.itc.it
|
X-Mailman-Version |
2.0.5
|
Precedence |
bulk
|
List-Help |
<mailto:grass5-request@grass.itc.it?subject=help>
|
List-Post |
<mailto:grass5@grass.itc.it>
|
List-Subscribe |
<http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5>, <mailto:grass5-request@grass.itc.it?subject=subscribe>
|
List-Id |
GRASS 5 Developers mailing list <grass5.grass.itc.it>
|
List-Unsubscribe |
<http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5>, <mailto:grass5-request@grass.itc.it?subject=unsubscribe>
|
List-Archive |
<http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/>
|
Date |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:50:02 +0100
|
Resent-From |
neteler@itc.it
|
Resent-Date |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:24:50 +0100
|
Resent-To |
grass-bugs@intevation.de |
Hi,
since d.legend has quite limited usability and d.leg.thin
is much better, I propose to replace d.legend with d.leg.thin
(delete d.legend, rename d.leg.thin -> d.legend).
Any objections?
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5
|
|
Fri, Nov 16 2001
18:30:54
|
|
Priority changed to 70 by mneteler
|
|
Fri, Nov 16 2001
19:51:19
|
|
Mail sent by glynn.clements@virgin.net
|
|
Return-Path |
<glynn.clements@virgin.net>
|
Delivered-To |
grass-bugs@lists.intevation.de
|
From |
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements@virgin.net>
|
MIME-Version |
1.0
|
Content-Type |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding |
7bit
|
Message-ID |
<15349.24461.155284.586888@cerise.nosuchdomain.co.uk>
|
Date |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:48:45 +0000
|
To |
Request Tracker <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
|
Cc |
grass5@grass.itc.it
|
Subject |
Re: [bug #852] (grass) [GRASS5] Suggestion: d.leg.thin -> d.legend
|
In-Reply-To |
<20011116172453.97F7313A0F@lists.intevation.de>
|
References |
<20011116172453.97F7313A0F@lists.intevation.de>
|
X-Mailer |
VM 6.94 under 21.4 (patch 4) "Artificial Intelligence (candidate #1)" XEmacs Lucid |
Request Tracker wrote:
> since d.legend has quite limited usability and d.leg.thin
> is much better, I propose to replace d.legend with d.leg.thin
> (delete d.legend, rename d.leg.thin -> d.legend).
Note: d.leg.thin isn't quite a complete replacement.
It's almost there: the default behaviour is equivalent to
"show=val,cat", and with the -n switch it's equivalent to "show=cat",
but there isn't an equivalent to "show=val".
Also, "d.leg.thin" doesn't have an option to include the "no data"
category.
Ideally they should be merged; then, d.legend could be removed without
losing functionality.
But which syntax should be used? And what about any existing scripts
which call d.legend? Should the removed program be replaced with a
script which calls the other program?
--
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements@virgin.net>
|
|
Mon, Nov 19 2001
19:19:49
|
|
Area changed to wish by gclements
|
|
Wed, Nov 21 2001
00:12:36
|
|
Priority changed to 25 by bernhard
|
|
Thu, Feb 28 2002
10:34:55
|
|
Status changed to resolved by mneteler
|
|