Quick feedback required
Posted by Jo Cook on August 21, 2013
Hi All,
Antony has very kindly put together the attached composite logo to be used on the clipboard- any feedback? I'd like to get our approval today, so it can be turned into the white on black background version for the clipboard and then sent out to the sponsors for quick (hopefully) approval tomorrow- then I can get the order sorted.
Thanks
Jo
Antony has very kindly put together the attached composite logo to be used on the clipboard- any feedback? I'd like to get our approval today, so it can be turned into the white on black background version for the clipboard and then sent out to the sponsors for quick (hopefully) approval tomorrow- then I can get the order sorted.
Thanks
Jo
Comments
Rollo Home on August 21, 2013:
1 - OS and MO logo are not level to each other (but other rows are all aligned). Just looks odd to my eye.
2 - OS and MO logo's are not large enough (but I would say that)
3 - do you mean white on black? Or black on white - as our B&W logo is: http://seeklogo.com/ordnance-survey-logo-103997.html
Anyway, OS will be very happy with this whatever.
Jo Cook on August 21, 2013:
Barry Rowlingson on August 21, 2013:
+1 to Rollo's comment about alignment. Will there be any more distinction between the two platinum and the five gold sponsors?
Jeremy Morley on August 21, 2013:
I'd shift the gold sponsors down a little, increase the size of the platinums a bit, and align & space the two platinums better. Maybe have the platinums align vertically on their bases, and pull that base to be slightly lower than the FOSS4G logo to give in biggest prominence.
Jeremy Morley on August 21, 2013:
Should there be an OSGeo logo on there...?
Jo Cook on August 21, 2013:
Jeremy Morley on August 21, 2013:
D'oh!!! 0/10 for observation - I think I was just seeing a "gold sponsor group"...
Urgh.
Jo Cook on August 21, 2013:
Jo
Antony Scott on August 21, 2013:
Jo Cook on August 21, 2013:
Jeremy Morley on August 21, 2013:
Barry Rowlingson on August 21, 2013:
My inkscape has a "black and white" filter in the extensions, but it only seems to threshold at 50% gray, so some bits of the logos disappear. I tried fiddling with other filters to darken everything but decided that wasn't going to work either. And it seemed to be a bit buggy with doing undo operations...
Antony Scott on August 21, 2013:
Jo Cook on August 21, 2013:
Antony Scott on August 21, 2013:
Rollo Home on August 22, 2013:
Jo Cook on August 22, 2013:
I'm going to send this to the sponsors with a request for quick feedback- the printers say there's a 10 day turn-around once artwork is approved so we do have enough time for this.
Thanks a lot for sorting this out Antony!
Jo
Jeremy Morley on August 22, 2013:
In the PDF there's some antialiasing problem or such on the top of the "O" of "Ordnance".
In the SVG, the edges of the conference logo are not as sharp as the others (antialiased).
Does any of this mean is not truly a binary monochrome? Does that matter?
Jeremy
Jo Cook on August 22, 2013:
Jo
Jeremy Morley on August 22, 2013:
Jo Cook on August 22, 2013:
Antony Scott on August 23, 2013:
Jeremy Morley on August 23, 2013:
This isn't my area of expertise - if you can check and are happy then I'm happy! (I've just been viewing the SVG in browsers. Between Safari, Chrome and a desktop application on Mac, Graphic Converter, there seems to be a mixture of effects, either antialiasing or spacing (in the FOSS4G logo particularly).) I can send screenshots if you're particularly fussed but if you think what you have will pass through the printing process ok then I'm very happy to defer to you guys.
Jeremy
Antony Scott on August 23, 2013:
-------- Original message --------
Antony Scott on August 26, 2013:
Barry Rowlingson on August 26, 2013:
I can't believe the printers will be vectorising the graphic, as Jo says, they are more likely to be rasterising it...
I've just found a vector OS logo (ripped it from a PDF) and replaced the png - resulting file is allvector.pdf (source allvector.svg) in the dropbox share.
Antony Scott on August 26, 2013:
Anyway... @Jo, the PDF file for printing is attached - it has had the black background removed, which I assume is what you need. The one with the black background in is also attached for reference.
Jeremy Morley on August 26, 2013:
Jeremy Morley on August 26, 2013:
Jo Cook on August 27, 2013:
Jo