"Call for papers" and email from David Herbert
Posted by Barry Rowlingson on January 15, 2013
Email from David Herbert to the list this morning, he's confused about papers and submissions. The website has to make it clear what we need and the difference between the two big streams - regular programme and academic track.
Can we rename the 'Call for Papers' for the regular programme into 'Call for Presentations'? "Call For Papers" sounds wrong here, and a bit academic for our audience. Its correct place is in the academic track call.
The "call for presentations" text should mention at the start that there is a separate "call for papers" for full papers for academic publishing, and the "call for papers" page should mention at the start that there is a separate "call for presentations" that just needs abstracts.
Maybe also a separate "Call for Workshops", which details that process separately. Maybe even change the page titles to "Submit a presentation" and "Propose a workshop" to make them less academic and more inviting?
What think you?
Can we rename the 'Call for Papers' for the regular programme into 'Call for Presentations'? "Call For Papers" sounds wrong here, and a bit academic for our audience. Its correct place is in the academic track call.
The "call for presentations" text should mention at the start that there is a separate "call for papers" for full papers for academic publishing, and the "call for papers" page should mention at the start that there is a separate "call for presentations" that just needs abstracts.
Maybe also a separate "Call for Workshops", which details that process separately. Maybe even change the page titles to "Submit a presentation" and "Propose a workshop" to make them less academic and more inviting?
What think you?
Comments
Barend Köbben on January 15, 2013:
I agree we could use some clarification. From "our" side, I propose to change the CfP page text to [additions in italic]:
"Call for Papers Academic Track
Final Call for Papers Academic Track: Submission open
Submission for papers in the Academic Track of FOSS4G 2013 is now open at http://2013.foss4g.org/ojs/
Note that FOSS4G features a larger stream of regular presentation slots, with its own Call for Presentations, next to this academic peer reviewed full paper track.
The FOSS4G 2013 Academic Track..."
Peter Batty on January 15, 2013:
Rafael Moreno on January 15, 2013:
1. I like "Call for Presentations" for general conference and "Call for Papers" for Academic Track.
2. As Peter says, in FOSS4G 2011 we had conversations about number of papers limits. At the end a predetermined limit on submissions was not necessary because: a) It is unlikely that one person/group submits more than 2 papers; b) If they do, it is unlikely that more than 2 papers will have enough quality to pass the review process; c) better to have more than not to have enough papers to fill the time slots in the Academic Track. In FOSS4G 2011 we barely had enough quality submissions to fill the program, because of last moment withdraws; d) the International Scientific Committee can ultimately decide to reduce the number of presentations by one person or group to avoid the dominance of one perspective. Quality and diversity of presentations are part of the considerations when deciding on the final program. I remember the case of a border line good paper from Africa that we decide to include in the program (the person ended up not coming) which is other considerations to keep in mind: people not showing or withdrawing in the last moment.
Franz-Josef Behr on January 15, 2013:
@Peter and Rafael: In the Academic Track we already have this phenomenon: Five submissions by one author.
Rafael Moreno on January 15, 2013:
Mark Iliffe on January 15, 2013:
Antony Scott on January 15, 2013:
The page contains a call for workshops too, though we could separate this out. My tendency is to keep it together for simplicity, but we can highlight either both in news, tweets, etc etc. We still need to get our submission system sorted before people can actually respond, we are due a call of the programme group this week and will try and get it in place pronto...
Steven Feldman on January 16, 2013:
Antony Scott on January 16, 2013:
Barry Rowlingson on January 16, 2013:
Barry Rowlingson on January 16, 2013:
presentation/workshop/academic paper structure.